trident
Membre confirmé
Nous a rejoints le : 28 Fév 2009 Messages : 1 494 Réside à : Montréal, Québec
|
 1 Patientez... |
Citation: Pour compléter ce que Grizzly a dit : Texte: Afghanistan as an Energy Transit Route
Due to its location between the oil and natural gas reserves of the Caspian Basin and the Indian Ocean, Afghanistan has long been mentioned as a potential pipeline route, though in the near term, several obstacles will likely prevent Afghanistan from becoming an energy transit corridor. During the mid-1990s, Unocal had pursued a possible natural gas pipeline from Turkmenistan's Dauletabad-Donmez gas basin via Afghanistan to Pakistan, but pulled out after the U.S. missile strikes against Afghanistan in August 1998. The Afghan government under President Karzai has tried to revive the Trans-Afghan Pipeline (TAP) plan, with periodic talks held between the governments of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Turkmenistan on the issue, but little progress appears to have been made as of early June 2004 (despite the signature on December 9, 2003, of a protocol on the pipeline by the governments of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Turkmenistan). President Karzai has stated his belief that the project could generate $100-$300 million per year in transit fees for Afghanistan, while creating thousands of jobs in the country.
Given the obstacles to development of a natural gas pipeline across Afghanistan, it seems unlikely that such an idea will make any progress in the near future, and no major Western companies have expressed interest in reviving the project. The security situation in Afghanistan remains an obvious problem, while tensions between India and Pakistan make it unlikely that such a pipeline could be extended into India and its large (and growing) gas market. Financial problems in the utility sector in India, which would be the major consumer of the natural gas, also could pose a problem for construction of the TAP line. Finally, the pipeline's $2.5-$3.5 billion estimated cost poses a significant obstacle to its construction. Tout ça pour dire que l'invasion de l'Afghanistan par l'OTAN n'était nullement motivée par ce pipeline, qui demeure toujours imaginaire depuis de nombreuse années. Si après, depuis, certains ont toujours le désire de relancer ce projet, j'ai hâte de voir la première pelleté de terre...
Et avant qu'il y ait quelqu'un qui fasse le lien entre CIA et Ben Laden, voici ce qu'en pensait Peter Bergen, le premier journaliste à avoir réalisé une entrevue avec Ben Laden (en 1997):
Texte: Bergen: Bin Laden, CIA links hogwash
The story about bin Laden and the CIA — that the CIA funded bin Laden or trained bin Laden — is simply a folk myth. There's no evidence of this. In fact, there are very few things that bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri and the U.S. government agree on. They all agree that they didn't have a relationship in the 1980s. And they wouldn't have needed to. Bin Laden had his own money, he was anti-American and he was operating secretly and independently.
The real story here is the CIA didn't really have a clue about who this guy was until 1996 when they set up a unit to really start tracking him.
Et ce qu'en pensaient les afghanisans, au début, de l'intervention de l'OTAN dans leur pays.
* Message déplacé *
20 |